#OpMurderForHire – Prozac and Paxil increase risk of birth defects – abnormalities affecting the skull and other parts of the body


Prozac use could increase birth defects in pregnant women, says study

However, the authors of the study stressed that the actual increased risk of already rare defects was small in each case

Health Correspondent

Researchers in the USA and Canada have confirmed a link between the use of commonly-prescribed antidepressants Prozac and Paxil by pregnant women, and a small increased risk of birth defects.

While the findings cannot prove causation, they back up previously observed associations of the drugs with heart defects and abnormalities affecting the skull and other parts of the body.

However, the authors of the study, who included experts from the USA’s respected Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, stressed that the actual increased risk of already rare defects was small in each case.

The links between antidepressants and birth defects have been subject of much discussion. Guidelines already advise doctors to avoid prescribing them to pregnant women unless in exceptional circumstances when the severity of a mother’s condition means the benefits are likely to outweigh the risks.

The findings back up previously observed associations of Prozac and Paxil The findings back up previously observed associations of Prozac and Paxil (Getty)
The latest findings come from a review of data on 17,952 mothers of infants born with birth defects and 9,857 mothers of children born without defects.

Researchers analysed the use, shortly before or early in pregnancy, of five antidepressants of the same type – selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. For three of the drugs, including the one used most commonly by women in the study, Sertraline, the researchers found no associations with birth defects.

However, previously reported associations of Prozac with heart wall defects and the condition craniosynostosis – in which babies are born with an irregularly shaped skull – were observed.

Five previously reported birth defects linked to Paxil were also seen, including heart defects, the usually fatal skull defect anencephaly and abdominal wall defects in which the intestines and in some cases the liver as well develop on the outside of the body.

However, in each case an already very small risk absolute risk increased only slightly.

For example, the biggest risk increases were seen for anencephaly, and for one kind of heart defect, among women who had taken Paxil during pregnancy.

If the link is causal, then the risk of anencephaly rises from two per 10,000 births to seven per 10,000, and the risk of the heart defect from 10 per 10,000 births to 24 per 10,000 births, the study said.

The authors of the study, published in the British Medical Journal, said their findings provided “reassuring evidence” for some SSRIs, but also provided guidance to the safest treatment options for women who needed antidepressants in early pregnancy.

“Continued scrutiny of the association between SSRIs and birth defects is warranted and additional studies of specific SSRI treatments during pregnancy are needed to enable women and their healthcare providers to make more informed decisions about treatment,” they write.

A spokesperson for the UK’s drugs watchdog the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said: “The authors of this report accept that the absolute risk of birth defects is small.

“Guidelines already advise doctors to avoid prescribing any antidepressants to pregnant women, or to use them with care, if the benefits are likely to outweigh the risks.

“The treatment for depression during pregnancy, whether it be through counselling or medicines will depend on a number of factors including the severity of the women’s depression and any potential risks associated with antidepressant treatment. Any decisions about treatment should be made following discussions between the women and her doctor and/or midwife.”

Read more: Expert: Anti-depressants do more harm than good
Study: Mindfulness can prevent relapses of depression
Fast-acting antidepressant could be on the horizon

Commenting on the study, Dr Michael Bloomfield, clinical lecturer in psychiatry at University College London, said: “The ways in which these drugs might potentially increase the risk of these birth defects needs further study. Likewise, further research is needed to explore whether the dose of particular treatments is associated with increased risk or not.

“This is important because generally speaking doctors in the United Kingdom have tended to prescribe lower doses of psychiatric medicines than in the United States of America, where this new study took place.”

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/prozac-use-could-increase-birth-defects-in-pregnant-women-says-study-10374875.html


The Nuremberg Code

1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2) The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5) No experiment should be conducted, where there is an apriori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9) During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

10) During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10″, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]

Source: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s