#OpIlluminatusPiedPiper – Star of Ishtar/Star of Venus in the British police flag – The British police have the symbol of child sacrifice on their head gear – The 2 principal deities of ancient Babylon were Baal & Ishtar – Baal was also called Bel, Baalat, Molech, Merodach, Mars & Tammuz – Ishtar was also called Aphrodite, Astarte, Ashtoreth, Cybele or Sybil, Diana, Europa, Isis, Semiramis & Venus – 2 main elements in the worship of the God of Babylon were fire & human sacrifice, usually children


The British police have the symbol of child sacrifice on their head gear

QueenOfHeavenStarOfVenusBabylonPoliceEmblemFlag of the Metropolitan Police Service

StarOfIshtarVenusLucifer & The Planet Venus

Kabiri, as a name, is derived from Habir , great, and also from Venus, this Goddess being called to the present day Kabar, as in also her star. The Kabiri were worshipped at Hebron, the city of the Anakim, or anakas (kings, princes). They are the highest Planetary Spirits, the “greatest Gods” and “the powerful.” Varro, following Orpheus, (Page 316 ) calls these Gods ευδυνατοι“divine Powers.” The word Kabirim when applied to men, and the words Heber, Gheber (with reference to Nimrod, or the “giants” of Genesis , vi.) and Kabir, are all derived from the “mysterious Word”—the Ineffable and the “Unprounceable.’ Thus it is they who represent tsaba , the “host of heaven.” The Church, however, bowing before the angel Anael (the regent of Venus). [ Venus with the Chaldæans and Egyptians was the wife of Proteus , and is regarded as the mother of the Kabiri, the sons of Phta or Emepth—the divine light or the Sun. The angels answer to the stars in the following order: The Sun, the Moon, Mars, Venus, Mercury, Jupiter and Saturn: Michael, Gabriel, Samael, Anael, Raphael, Zachariel, and Orifiel: this is in religion and Christian Kabalism; astrologically and esoterically the places of the “regents” stand otherwise, as also in the Jewish, or rather the real Chaldæan Kabalah. ] connects the planet Venus with Lucifer, the chief of the rebels under Satan—so poetically apostrophized by the prophet Isaiah as “O, Lucifer, son of the morning.” [ Loc.cit., xiv.12. ] All the Mystery Gods were Kabiri. As these “seven lictors” relate directly to the Secret Doctrine their real status is of the greatest importance” (Blavatsky, 1800).

The Druids understood the meaning of the Sun in Taurus, therefore when all the fires were extinguished on the 1st of November their sacred and inextinguishable fire remained alone to illumine the horizon like those of the Magi and the modern Zoroastrian. And like the early Fifth Race and the later Chaldaeans and Greeks, and again like the Christians (who do it to this day without suspecting the real meaning), they greeted the “Morning-Star,” the beautiful Venus-Lucifer. [Mr Kenealy quotes, in his Book of God, Vallancey, who says: “I had not been a week landed in Ireland from Gibraltar, where I had studied Hebrew and Chaldaic under Jews of various countries, when I heard a peasant girl say to a boor standing by her ‘Feach an Maddin Nag’(Behold the morning star) pointing to the planet Venus, the Maddena Nag of the Chaldeans.”] Strabo speaks of an island near Britannia where Ceres and Persephone were worshipped with the same rites as in Samothrace, and this was the sacred Ierna, where a perpetual fire was lit” (Blavatsky, 1800).

Now Buddhi and Mercury correspond with each other, and both are yellow, or radiant and golden coloured. In the human system, the right eye corresponds with Buddhi and Mercury; and the left with Manas and Venus or Lucifer” (Blavatsky, 1800).

Lucifer – (Latin). Literally the light-bearer, therefore used by H.P. BLAVATSKY as the title for her magazine which she founded in September 1887 and continued monthly until May 1891. Published posthumously until 1897. A passage in Rev. xvi, 22 reads: ‘I am … the bright morning star,’ signifying Lucifer, or Phosphor in Greek, the planet Venus. The first issue, which appeared on September 15, 1887, bore this message on the title-page. ‘A Theosophical Magazine, designed to bring to light the hidden things of darkness.’” (Barborka, 1970).

People usually wish that their friends shall have a happy new year, and sometimes “prosperous” is added to “ happy.” It is not likely that much happiness or prosperity can come to those who are living for the truth under such a dark number as 1888 ; but still the year is heralded by the glorious star Venus-Lucifer, shining so resplendently that it has been mistaken for that still rarer visitor, the star of Bethlehem” (IAPSOP, 1888).

The “ Star of Bethlehem ” has re­ appeared, so they say, to prove the truth of the Christian story. But, sad to say, it is not the star of Christ that is now visible in the south-east before sun­ rise every morning. It is Venus in her heliacal rising. It is Venus as the Maleess, or Lucifer as “ Sun of the Morning.” This particular Star of Bethlehem — there are various others less brilliant and less noticeable— generally does return once every nineteen months or so, when the planet Venus is the Morning Star. Only the gaping camel-swallowers, who know all about the “ Star of Bethlehem,’’ and the fulfilment of prophecy, are not up in Astronomy, and they will no doubt squirm and strain at this small gnat of real fact offered to them by way of an explanation” (IAPSOP, 1888).

Lucifer,” is the pale morning-star, the precursor of the full blaze of the noon-day sun— the “Eosphoros” of the Greeks. It shines timidly at dawn to gather forces and dazzle the eye after sunset as its own brother ‘ Hesperos’— the radiant evening star, or the planet Venus” (IAPSOP, 1887).

Christ, we are told, is the “ Morning Star,” the divine Lucifer ; and Satan the usurpator of the Verbum, the “ infernal Lucifer.” * “ The great Archangel Michael, the conqueror of Satan, is identical in paganism t with Mercury-Mithra, to whom, after defending the Sun (symbolical of God) from the attacks of Venus-Lucifer, was given the possession of this planet, et datus est ei loctis Luciferi. And since the Archangel Michael is the ‘ Angel of the Face,’ and ‘ the Vicar of the Verbum ’ he is now considered in the Roman Church as the regent of that planet Venus which ‘ the vanquished fiend had usurped.’ ” Angelus faciei Dei sedem superbi humilis obtinuit, says Cornelius a Lapide (in Vol. VI. p. 229)” (IAPSOP, 1887).

No star, among the countless myriads that twinkle over the sidereal fields of the night sky, shines so dazzlingly as the planet Venus — not even Sirius-Sothis, the dog-star, beloved by Isis. Venus is the queen among our planets, the crown jewel of our solar system. She is the inspirer of the poet, the guardian and companion of the lonely shepherd, the lovely morning and the evening star. For,

“Stars teach as well as shine.”

although their secrets are still untold and unrevealed to the majority of men, including astronomers. They are “ a beauty and a mystery,” verily. But “ where there is a mystery, it is generally supposed that there must also be evil,” says Byron. Evil, therefore, was detected by evilly-disposed human fancy, even in those bright luminous eyes peeping at our wicked world through the veil of ether. Thus there came to exist slandered stars and planets as well as slandered men and women. Too often are the reputation and fortune of one man or party sacrificed for the benefit of another man or party. As on earth below, so in the heavens above, and Venus, the sister planet of our Earth, * was sacrificed to the ambition of our little globe to show the latter the “ chosen ” planet of the Lord. She became the scapegoat, the Azasiel of the starry dome, for the sins of the Earth, or rather for those of a certain class in the human family— the clergy— who slandered the bright orb, in order to prove what their ambition suggested to them as the best means to reach power, and exercise it unswervingly over the superstitious and ignorant masses.

This took place during the middle ages. And now the sin lies black at the door of Christians and their scientific inspirers, though the error was successfully raised to the lofty position of a religious dogma, as many other fictions and inventions have been.

Indeed, the whole sidereal world, planets and their regents— t h e ^ ancient gods of poetical paganism— the sun, the moon, the elements, and the entire host of incalculable worlds— those at least which happened to be known to the .Church Fathers— shared in the same fate. They have all been slandered, all bedevilled by the insatiable desire of proving one little system of theology— built on and constructed out of

* “ Venus is a second Earth,” says Reynaud, in Terre et d el (p. 74), “ so much so that were there any communication possible between the two planets, their inhabitants might take their respective earths for the two hemispheres of the same world. . . . They seem on the sky, like two sisters. Similar in conformation, these two worlds are also similar in the character assigned to them in the Universe.”

old pagan materials— the only right and holy one, and all those which \ preceded or followed it utterly wrong. Sun and stars, the very air itself, we are asked to believe, became pure and “ redeemed ” from original sin and the Satanic element of heathenism, only after the year I , A .D . Scholastics and scholiasts, the spirit of whom “ spurned laborious investigation and slow induction,” had shown, to the satisfaction of infallible Church, the whole Kosmos in the power of Satan— a poor compliment to God— before the year of the Nativity; and Christians had to believe or be condemned. Never have subtle sophistry and casuistry shown themselves so plainly in their true light, however, as in the questions of the ex-Satanism and later redemption of various heavenly bodies. Poor beautiful Venus got worsted in that war of so- called divine proofs to a greater degree than any of her sidereal col­ leagues. While the history of the other six planets, and their gradual transformation from Greco-Aryan gods into Semitic devils, and finally into “ divine attributes of the seven eyes of the Lord,” is known but to the educated, that of Venus-Lucifer has become a household story among even the most illiterate in Roman Catholic countries.

This story shall now be told for the benefit of those who may have neglected their astral mythology.

Venus, characterised by Pythagoras as the sol alter, a second Sun, on account of her magnificent radiance— equalled by none other— was the first to draw the attention of ancient Theogonists. Before it began to be called Venus, it was known in /r^-Hesiodic theogony as Eosphoros (or Phosphoros) and Hesperos, the children of the dawn and twilight. In Hesiod, moreover, the planet is decomposed into two divine beings, two brothers— Eosphoros (the Lucifer of the Latins) the morning, and t Hesperos, the evening star. They are the children of Astroeos and’ Eos, the starry heaven and the dawn, as also of Kephalos and Eos ( Theog : 381, Hyg: Poet: Astron: 11, 42). Preller, quoted by Decharme, shows Phaeton identical with Phosphoros or Lucifer ( Griech: Mythol: 1. 365). And on the authority of Hesiod he also makes Phaeton the son of the latter two divinities— Kephalos and Eos.

Now Phaeton or Phosphoros, the “ luminous morning orb,” is carried away in his early youth by Aphrodite (Venus) who makes of him the night guardian of her sanctuary ( Theog: 987-991). He is the “ beautiful morning star ” (Vide St. John’s Revelation XXII. 16) loved for its radiant light by the Goddess of the Dawn, Aurora, who, while gradually eclipsing the light of her beloved, thus seeming to carry off the star, makes it reappear on the evening horizon where it watches the gates of heaven. In early morning, Phosphoros “ issuing from the waters of the Ocean, raises in heaven his sacred head to announce the approach of divine light.” (Iliad, X XIII. 226 ; Odyss: XIII. 93 ; Virg : yEneid, VIII. 589 ; Myihol: de la Grece Antique. 247). He holds a torch in his hand and flies through space as he precedes the car of Aurora. In the evening he becomes Hesperos, “ the most splendid of the stars that shine on the celestial vault ” {Iliad, X X II. 317). He is the father of the Hesperides, the guardians of the golden apples together with the Dragon ; the beautiful genius of the flowing golden curls, sung and glorified in all the ancient epithalami (the bridal songs of the early Christians as of the pagan Greeks); he, who at the fall of the night, leads the nuptial cortege and delivers the bride into the arms of the bridegroom. ( Carmen Nuptiale. See Mythol: de la Grcce Antique. Decharme.)

So far, there seems to be no possible rapprochement, no analogy to be discovered between this poetical personification of a star, a purely astronomical myth, and the Satanism of Christian theology. True, the close connection between the planet as Hesperos, the evening star, and the Greek Garden of Eden with its Dragon and the golden apples may, with a certain stretch of imagination, suggest some painful comparisons with the third chapter of Genesis. But this is insufficient to justify the building of a theological wall of defence against paganism made up of slander and misrepresentations.

But of all the Greek euhemerisations, Lucifer-Eospfyoros is, perhaps, the most complicated. The planet has become with the Latins, Venus, or Aphrodit c-Anadyotnetie, the foam-born Goddess, the “ Divine Mother,” and one with the Phoenician Astarte, or the Jewish Astaroth. They were all called “ The Morning Star,” and the Virgins of the Sea, or Mar (whence Mary), the great Deep, titles now given by the Roman Church to their Virgin Mary. They were all connected with the moon and the crescent, with the Dragon and the planet Venus, as the mother of Christ has been made connected with all these attributes. If the Phoenician mariners carried, fixed on the prow of their ships, the image of the god­dess Astarte (or Aphrodite, Venus Erycina) and looked upon the evening and the morning star as their guiding star, “ the eye of their Goddess mother,” so do the Roman Catholic sailors the same to this day. They fix a Madonna on the prows of their vessels, and the blessed Virgin Mary is called the “ Virgin of the Sea.” The accepted patroness of Christian sailors, their star, “ Stella Del M a r etc., she stands on the crescent moon. Like the old pagan Goddesses, she is the “ Queen of Heaven,” and the “ Morning Star ” just as they were.

Whether this can explain anything, is left to the reader’s sagacity. Meanwhile, Lucifer-Venus has nought to do with darkness, and every­ thing with light. When called Lucifer, it is the “ light bringer,” the first radiant beam which destroys the lethal darkness of night. When named Venus, the planet-star becomes the symbol of dawn, the chaste Aurora. Professor Max Muller rightly conjectures that Aphrodite, born of the sea, is a personification of the Dawn of Day, and the most lovely of all the sights in Nature (“ Science of Language ”) for, before her naturalisa­ tion by the Greeks, Aphrodite was Nature personified, the life and light of the Pagan world, as proven in the beautiful invocation to Venus by Lucretius, quoted by Decharme. She is divine Nature in her entirety, Aditi-Prakriti before she becomes Lakshmi. She is that Nature before whose majestic and fair face, “ the winds fly away, the quieted sky pours torrents of light, and the sea-waves smile,” (Lucretius). When referred to as the Syrian goddess Astarte, the Astaroth of Hieropolis, the radiant planet was personified as a majestic woman, holding in one outstretched hand a torch, in the other, a crooked staff in the form of a cross. ( Vide Lucian’s De Dea Syrie, and Cicero’s De Nat: Deorum , 3 c.23). Finally, the planet is represented astronomically, as a globe poised above the cross — a symbol no devil would like to associate with— while the planet Earth is a globe with a cross over it.

But then, these crosses are not the symbols of Christianity, but the Egyptian crux ansata, the attribute of Isis (who is Venus, and Aphrodite, Nature, also) $ or ? the planet; the fact that the Earth has the crux ansata reversed, 6 having a great occult significance upon which there is no necessity of entering at present.

Now what says the Church and how does it explain the “ dreadful association.” The Church believes in the devil, of course, and could not afford to lose him. “ The Devil is the chief pillar of the Church” confesses unblushingly an advocate- * of the Ecclesia Militans. “ All the Alexan­ drian Gnostics speak to us of the fall of the yEons and their Pleroma, and all attribute that fall to the desire to know” writes another volunteer in the same army, slandering the Gnostics as usual and identifying the desire to know or occultism, magic, with Satanism.*!* And then, forthwith, he quotes from SchlegeFs Philosophic de I’Histoire to show that the seven rectors (planets) of Pymander, “ commissioned by God to contain the phenomenal world in their seven circles, lost in love with their own beauty, + came to admire themselves with such intensity that owing to this proud self-adulation they finally fell.”

Perversity having thus found its way amongst the angels, the most beautiful creature of God “ revolted against its Maker.” That creature is in theological fancy Venus-Lucifer, or rather the informing Spirit or Regent of that planet. This teaching is based on the following specula­tion. The three principal heroes of the great sidereal catastrophe mentioned in Revelation are, according to the testimony of the Church fathers— “ the Verbum, Lucifer his usurper (see editorial) and the grand Archangel who conquered him,” and whose “ palaces” (the “ houses”

* Thus saith Des Mousseaux. “ Mceurs et Pratiques des Demons.” p. X.— and he is corroborated in this by Cardinal de Ventura. The Devil, he says, “ is one of the great personages whose life is closely allied to that of the Church; and without him . . . . the fall of man could not have taken place. If it were not for him (the Devil), the Saviour, the Redeemer, the Crucified would be but the most ridiculous of supernumeraries and the Cross an insult to good sense.” And if so, then we should feel thankful to the poor Devil. t De Mirville. “ No Devil, no Christ,” he exclaims. % This is only another version of Narcissus, the Greek victim of his own fair looks.

astrology calls them) are in the Sun, Venus-Lucifer and Mercury. This is quite evident, since the position of these orbs in the Solar system corres­ pond in their hierarchical order to that of the “ heroes ” in Chapter xii of Revelation “ their names and destinies (?) being closely connected in the theological (exoteric) system with these three great metaphysical names.” (De Mirville’s Memoir to the Academy of France, on the rapping Spirits and the Demons).

The outcome of this was, that theological legend made of Venus-Lucifer the sphere and domain of the fallen Archangel, or Satan before his apostacy. Called upon to reconcile this statement with that other fact, that the metaphor of “ the morning star,” is applied to both Jesus, and his Virgin mother, and that the planet Venus-Lucifer is included, moreover, among the “ stars ” of the seven planetary spirits worshipped by the Roman Catholics * under new names, the defenders of the Latin dogmas and beliefs answer as follows :—

Lucifer, the jealous neighbour of the Sun (Christ) said to himself in his great pride : ‘ I will rise as high as he ! ’ He was thwarted in his design by Mercury, though the brightness of the latter (who is St. Michael) was as much lost in the blazing fires of the great Solar orb as his own was, and though, like Lucifer, Mercury is only the assessor, and the guard of honour to the Sun.”— (Ibid.)

Guards of “ dishonour ” now rather, if the teachings of theological Christianity were true. But here comes in the cloven foot of the Jesuit. The ardent defender of Roman Catholic Demonolatry and of the worship of the seven planetary spirits, at the same time, pretends great wonder at the coincidences between old Fagan and Christian legends, between the fable about Mercury and Venus, and the historical truths told of St. Michael— the “ angel of the face,”— the terrestrial double, or ferouer of Christ He points them out saying : “ like Mercury, the archangel Michael, is the friend of the Sun, his Mitra, perhaps, for Michael is a psychopompic genius, one who leads the separated souls to their appointed abodes, and like Mitra, he is the well-known adversary of the demons .” This is demonstrated by the book of the Nabatheans recently discovered

* The famous temple dedicated to the Seven Angels at Rome, and built by Michael- Angelo in 1561, is still there, now called the “ Church of St. Mary of the Angels.” In the old Roman Missals printed in 1563— one or two of which may still be seen in Palazzo Barberini— one may find the religious service (officio) of the seven angels, and their old and occult names. That the “ angels ” are the pagan Rectors, under different names— the Jewish having replaced the Greek and Latin names— of the seven planets is proven by what Pope Pius V. said in his Bull to the Spanish Clergy, permitting and encouraging the worship of the said seven spirits of the stars. “ One cannot exalt too much these seven rectors of the world, figured by the seven planets , as it is consoling to our century to witness by the grace of God the cult of these seven ardent lights , and of these seven stars reassuming all its lustre in the Christian republic.” (Les Sept Esprits et tHistoire de leur Culte; De Mirville’s 2nd memoir addressed to the Academy. Vol. II. p. 358.)

(by Chwolson), in which the Zoroastian Mitra is called the “ grand enemy of the planet Venus” * (ibid p. 160.)

There is something in this. A candid confession, for once, of perfect identity of celestial personages and of borrowing from every pagan source. It is curious, if unblushing. While in the oldest Mazdean allegories, Mitra conquers the planet Venus, in Christian tradition Michael defeats Lucifer, and both receive, as war spoils, the planet of the vanquished deity.

“ Mitra,” says Dollinger, “ possessed, in days of old, the star of Mercury, placed between the sun and the moon, but he was given the planet of the conquered, and ever since his victory he is identified with Venus.” (“ fudaisme and Paganisme” Vol. II,p. 109. French transl.)

“ In the Christian tradition,” adds the learned Marquis, “ St. Michael is apportioned in Heaven the throne and the palace of the foe he has van­quished. Moreover, like Mercury, during the palmy days of paganism, which made sacred to this demon- god all the promontories of the earth, the Archangel is the patron of the same in our religion” This means, if it does mean anything, that now, at any rate, Lucifer-Venus is a sacred planet, and no synonym of Satan, since St. Michael has become his legal heir ?

The above remarks conclude with this cool reflection :

“ It is evident that paganism has utilised beforehand, and most mar­vellously, all the features and characteristics of the prince of the face of the Lord (Michael) in applying them to that Mercury, to the Egyptian Hermes Anubis, and the Hermes Christos of the Gnostics. Each of these was represented as the first among the divine councillors, and the god nearest to the sun, quis ut Deus.”

Which title, with all its attributes, became that of Michael. The good Fathers, the Master Masons of the temple of Church Christianity, knew indeed how to utilize pagan material for their new dogmas.

The fact is, that it is sufficient to examine certain Egyptian cartouches, pointed out by Rossellini (Eeypte , Vol. I., p. 289), to find Mercury (the double of Sirius in our solar system) as Sothis, preceded by the words “ sole ” and “ sol is custode, sostegnon dei dominanti, e forte grande dei vigilanti ,” “ watchman of the sun, sustainer of dominions, and the strongest of all the vigilants.” All these titles and attributes are now those of the Archangel Michael, who has inherited them from the demons of paganism.

Moreover, travellers in Rome may testify to the wonderful presence in the statue of Mitra, at the Vatican, of the best known Christian symbols. Mystics boast of it. They find “ in his lion’s head, and the eagle’s wings, those of the courageous Seraph, the master of space (Michael) ; in his caduceus, the spear, in the two serpents coiled round the body,

* Herodotus showing the identity of Mitra and Venus, the sentence in the Nabathean Agriculture is evidently misunderstood.

the struggle of the good and bad principles, and especially in the two keys which the said Mitra holds, like St. Peter, the keys with which this Seraph-patron of the latter opens and shuts the gates of Heaven, astra cludit et recludit .” {Mem: p. 162.)

To sum up, the aforesaid shows that the theological romance of Lucifer was built upon the various myths and allegories of the pagan world, and that it is no revealed dogma, but simply one invented to uphold superstition. Mercury being one of the Sun’s assessors, or the cynocepliali of the Egyptians and the watch-dogs of the Sun , literally, the other was Eosphoros, the most brilliant of the planets, “ qui mane oriebaris ,” the early rising, or the Greek opdptvot. It was identical with the Amoon-ra, the light-bearer of Egypt, and called by all nations “ the second born of light ” (the first being Mercury), the begin­ ning of his (the Sun’s) ways of wisdom, the Archangel Michael being also referred to as the principinm viarum Domini.

Thus a purely astronomical personification, built upon an occult meaning which no one has hitherto seemed to unriddle outside the Eastern wisdom, has now become a dogma, part and parcel of Christian revelation. A clumsy transference of characters is unequal to the task of making thinking people accept in one and the same trinitarian group, the “ Word” or Jesus, God and Michael (with the Virgin occa­sionally to complete it) on the one hand, and Mitra, Satan and Apollo-Abbadon on the other : the whole at the whim and pleasure of Roman Catholic Scholiasts. If Mercury and Venus (Lucifer) are (astronomically in their revolution around the Sun) the symbols of God the Father, the Son, and of their Vicar, Michael, the “ Dragon-Conqueror,” in Christian legend, why should they when called ApoWo-Abaddon, the “ King of the Abyss,” Lucifer, Satan, or Venus— become forthwith devils and demons? If we are told that the “ conqueror,” or “ Mercury-Sun,” or again St. Michael of the Revelation, was given the spoils of the conquered angel, namely, his planet, why should opprobrium be any longer attached to a constellation so purified ? Lucifer is now the “ Angel of the Face of the Lord,”* because “ that face is mirrored in it.” We think rather, because the Sun is reflecting his beams in Mercury seven times more than it does on our Earth, and twice more in Lucifer-Venus : the Christian symbol proving again its astronomical origin. But whether from the astronomical, mystical or symbological aspect, Lucifer is as good as any other planet To advance as a proof of its demoniacal character, and identity with Satan, the configuration of Venus, which gives to the crescent of this planet the appearance of a cut-off horn is rank nonsense. But to connect this with the horns of “ The Mystic

* “ Both in Biblical and pagan theologies,” says de Mirville, “ the Sun has its god, its defender, and its sacrilegious usurper, in other words, its Ormuzd, its planet Mercury (Mitra), and its Lucifer, Venus (or Ahriman), taken away from its ancient master, and now given to its conqueror.” (p. 164.) Therefore, Lucifer-VTenus is quite holy now.

Dragon ” in Revelation — “ one of which was broken ” *— as the two French Demonologists, the Marquis de Mirville and the Chevalier des Mousseaux, the champions of the Church militant, would have their readers believe in the second half of our present century— is simply an insult to the public.

Besides which, the Devil had .no horns before the fourth century of the Christian era. It is a purely Patristic invention arising from their desire to connect the god Pan, and the pagan Fauns and Satyrs, with their Satanic legend. The demons of Heathendom were as hornless and as tailless as the Archangel Michael himself in the imaginations of his worshippers. The “ horns ” were, in pagan symbolism, an emblem of divine power and creation, and of fertility in nature. Hence the ram’s horns of Ammon, of Bacchus, and of Moses on ancient medals, and the cow’s horns of Isis and Diana, etc., etc., and of the Lord God of the Prophets of Israel himself. For Habakkuk gives the evidence that this symbolism was accepted by the “ chosen people ” as much as by the Gentiles. In Chapter III. that prophet speaks of the “ Holy One from Mount Paran,” of the Lord God who “ comes from Teman, and whose brightness was as the light” and who had “ horns coming out of his hand.”

When one reads, moreover, the Hebrew text of Isaiah, and finds that no Lucifer is mentioned at all in Chapter XIV., v. 12, but simply Wv-i ‘ • 1 Hillel , “ a bright star,” one can hardly refrain from wondering that educated people should be still ignorant enough at the close of our cen­tury to associate a radiant planet— or anything else in nature for the matter of that— with the Devil!” (IAPSOP, 1887).

Thus our Lucifer, the “ Morning Star,” being identical with Venus, is, therefore, the same as the Chaldean Istar, or the Jewish Astoreth, to whom the Hebrews offered cakes and buns, addressing her as the Lady of Light and the Queen of Heaven. She is the “ great star,” Wormwood, whom the misanthropical St. John sees falling down to the earth in Revelation (Chapter viii.), as her great rival is Aima, the fruitful mother, or the third Sephiroth Binah ( ihvh alhim , or the female Jah-hovah), the “ woman with child,” in Chapter xii. of the same” (IAPSOP, 1887).

Venus as Van-esh and Luxfero, Phosphorus or Lucifer, must be well known to all our readers. Venus is also called Bhavanee, Parvutee, Pravati, and Doorga, the impregnable, “ Kartikya and Pravati,” or Mercury and Venus, and conjointly Hermes-Aphrodite, i.e. the An­ drogynous Buddhi— Manas. Venus rules over Friday the 6th day; Hebrew Sis or Shesh, meaning bright, cheerful, sparkling. Venus is variously called Lucifer, Hesperus, Vesta, Hestia &c. Of the Vestal virgins there were six said to be the guardians of the Sacred fire. This mythos when viewed in connection with Venus, whose root number is Six, at once suggests the Linga Yoni and Solipse i.e., the two interlaced triangles, or six pointed star, with a central Fire or Life source callcd Bhavani or Venus (vide symbol of Theosophical Society). Anael, Haniel, Tables 1 and 2, is Diana, Anna. Hannah, the Bride of On Hanniel, (Hebrew) means the Gracious Spirit or Power. Freya or Frigga, the Northern Goddess of Beauty is the same as Phria (Hebrew) the Fruitful. Therefore as the Vestal Virgin of Heaven, Venus is the Sacred Nun, the fruitful yet immaculate source of life. The word “ Nun ” means a fish ; hence arises the sacred association of “ the diet of fish ” with Dies Veneris. Nogahel, from Nogah, to shine or glitter, doubtless refers to the appearance of the planet Venus, and such of us as are more nearly under its magnetic influence ; thus Nogah and Nogah Zaharah (Hebrew) is “ the pellucid brightness” or “ the clear shining” (ibid note 1). Moledotha or Molyedoth means “ She who filleth the hands.” Uriel, Table 3, is the Spirit of Light The Hebrew Aur, light, is from Ar, to flow, whence we may conclude that the “ undulatory theory ” of light-was that supported by the Hebrews and their Teachers, the Chaldeans and Egyptians. The formative letter U, vau, or wav (numerical value six), means to connect, link, hook together, or to marry, by which peculiarities it became a special sign for Venus. Uriel, Auriel, or Oriel is the same as Luxfero, “ the Light bearer.”” (IAPSOP, 1889).

G— Saturn or Sat-ar-nons, the “ pure Light mind ” is also known as Chronos, the god of time, and Charon, the mystic conveyer of souls into Hades. Saturn rules the 7th day, i.e., the Sabbath; hence the Hebrew name of Saturn was Shebatael. The word Sabbath means to rest, to stay, cease or complete. Thus Saturn is sometimes compared to the Hindu Shiv, “ the Restorer ” or “ the Destroyer.”” (IAPSOP, 1889).

Venus Aphrodite is one with the Astarte, Astoreth, etc. of the Phoenicians, and she is one (as a planet) with “ Lucifer ” the “ Morning Star” (IAPSOP, 1887).

The morning star, Lucifer-Venus was dedicated to that Great Mother symbolized by the heifer or the “ Golden Calf.” For, as says Mr. G. Massey in his lecture on “ The Hebrews and their Crea­tions,” “This (the Golden Calf) being of either sex, it supplied a twin-type for Venus, as Hathor or Ishtar (Astoreth), the double star, that was male at rising, and female at sunset” She is the “ Celestial Aphrodite,” Venus Victrix vtfflipopos associated with Ares (see Pausanias I, 8, 4, 11, 25, 1)” (IAPSOP, 1887).


Barborka, G, A, (1970). H.P. BLAVATSKY: THE LIGHT BRINGER. The Theosophical Publishing House Ltd. London. http://hpb.narod.ru/HPB_Light_Bringer.htm Accessed 20/12/2014

Blavatsky, H, P, (1800s). The Secret Doctrine, Volume 3. Publisher Unknown. Location Unknown. http://www.theosophical.ca/books/SecretDoctrine,The_HPBlavatsky.pdf Accessed 20/12/2014

IAPSOP, (1887). Lucifer. The International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals. United States of America. http://www.iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/lucifer_v1_n1_september_1887.pdf Accessed 20/12/2014

IAPSOP, (1887). Lucifer. The International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals. United States of America. http://www.iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/lucifer_v1_n2_october_1887.pdf Accessed 20/12/2014

IAPSOP, (1887). Lucifer. The International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals. United States of America. http://www.iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/lucifer_v1_n4_december_1887.pdf Accessed 20/12/2014

IAPSOP, (1888). Lucifer. The International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals. United States of America. http://www.iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/lucifer_v1_n5_january_1888.pdf Accessed 20/12/2014

IAPSOP, (1889). Lucifer. The International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals. United States of America. http://www.iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/lucifer_v4_n23_july_1889.pdf Accessed 20/12/2014



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s