#OpDateRape – A reply to alleged Jewish psychologist Daniel Eidensohn who wrote a blog titled ‘Satanic child abuse is believed by anti-Semites to be a world wide Jewish plot’ linking to my blog – yadmoshe@gmail.com

——————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————

Introduction

This article is a peer review of an alleged Jewish psychology professor who was kind enough to link to one of my articles while at the same time targeting Jewish victims of child abuse and using his alleged position of trust to target those who bring attention to child abuse in the Jewish community with allegations of anti-Semitism. A person who disagrees with Jewish nepiophilia, paedophilia, incest, bestiality and necrophilia, who brings attention to their extreme indoctrination of children is incorrectly labelled as an anti-Semite.

According to the Anti Defamation League, anti semitism is “The belief or behavior hostile toward Jews just because they are Jewish. It may take the form of religious teachings that proclaim the inferiority of Jews, for instance, or political efforts to isolate, oppress, or otherwise injure them. It may also include prejudiced or stereotyped views about Jews“. For the readers information I do not hate Jews, I would marry a Jewish woman, I do not “proclaim the inferiority of Jews“, my efforts are not “political efforts to isolate, oppress, or otherwise injure them“. I hold no allegiance to any political group or organization, religion or religious group or institution. I am an Agnostic/Atheist who believes in science, no religion in the history of the human race has ever proved scientifically that their belief system is in order. I remain Atheist, Agnostic in that if a religion can scientifically prove their belief I would be willing to give them my acknowledgement.

Who

The alleged psychology professor in question goes by the name Daniel Eidensohn, on his blog he gives the following introduction;

I have a Ph.D.in psychology and have provided guidance and short-term therapy for many years – especially in areas of religious conficts & reframing. In the last 25 years I have been writing reference books for the Orthodox Jewish community. I am primarily interested that people know and understand what the acceptable alternatives are rather than selling a particular view or engaging in apologetics. Full acceptance of Orthodox Judaism and halacha is a given. There will not be any discussion to justify or prove the validity of Torah or halacha. My books include Yad Moshe the index to the Igros Moshe of Rav Moshe Feinstein, Yad Yisroel the index to the Mishna Berura of the Chofetz Chaim and Daas Torah an encyclopedia of Jewish Theology. I have recently published 3 volumes on the issue of Child and Domestic Abuse in the Jewish community and a revised 2nd edition of Daas Torah (-available in seforim stores and Amazon).. In recent years I have received guidance from Rav Moshe Sternbuch of the Eidah Charedis. I am a member of the chareidi community in Jerusalem. Email –yadmoshe@gmail.com

(https://www.blogger.com/profile/07252904288544083215)

As you can see the alleged professor is a member of the chareidi community in Jerusalem, Haredi (Chareidi, Charedi, plural Charedim) Judaism is a stream of Orthodox Judaism who reject modern secular culture, a form of extreme Judaism. Haredi Jews follow the Torah which they believe is a document that was either revealed to Moses by a God of some sort on Mount Sinai or that during the trek through the wilderness Mosses completed the Torah. Boys and girls are segregated from eachother and attend separate schools where they learn higher Torah study. Torah study is the study of the Torah, Hebrew Bible, Talmud, responsa, rabbinic literature and similar works, all of which are Judaism’s religious texts. The term “Talmud” normally refers to the collection of writings named specifically the Babylonian Talmud, though there is also an earlier collection known as the Jerusalem Talmud.

The Babylonian Talmud teaches that baby boys may be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men. The Talmud teaches “nine years and one day” is the age of male maturity, under “nine years and one day“, the “first stage of intercourse” of a boy with the mother, or any grown woman, is harmless. The Babylonian Talmud indoctrinates children to see paedophilia as acceptable, it states “When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this — that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger into the eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years“. Also “A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition“. It goes on, at three years old a baby girl is always rated as “one who is fit for cohabitation — that is one who has attained the age of three years and one day“. In the context of a baby girl under three years old who is not Jewish, known as a “proselyte” to Jews, she may be “married” by a grown priest “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest“, “one who is fit for cohabitation“, ie sex, as stated on the same page, is “one who has attained the age of three years and one day” the Talmud teaches. Again, a little girl “under eleven years and one day“, “carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner“. Reported in the Jewish press in 1954, attempts to alter state laws to legalize marriages between an uncle and his niece were made, this is common in rabbinical circles. Jewish children are indoctrinated with such verses as “Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal adultery. If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered“. Jewish children are indoctrinated in necrophilia, sex with the dead bodies of relatives, “The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman [Footnote 15] even though she died as a married woman” one is “exonerated” for, or is permitted to have intercourse with dead relatives “with a relaxed membrum“, because “no fertilization can possibly result“.

For a more in depth analysis see Appendix C & D at the end of this document.

Haredim have a grandiose belief system, they regard themselves as the most religiously authentic Jews, a claim which is widely contested by Jews. Haredim Jews are so extreme they isolate themselves from anyone who does not share their belief system, they limit their contact with the outside world, from other Jews as well as none Jews. Their isolation from mainstream society is understandable given their extreme indoctrination, warped view of reality and dress code;

As you can see it isn’t the norm in western society to wear a fluffy tire on your head, a silk tight fitting jacket with sideburns curled into pretty locks like a girl, a white shirt, dress pants as informal dress code. Where I come from it is jeans or jogging bottoms and a t-shirt with a pair of comfy Nike or Adidas trainers, the causal outfit you wear for making a quick escape from an intrusive police force with God complex, for no other reason than that’s the way you were brought up.

The person in question claims a PhD in psychology, he claims to have provided what he calls guidance and has experience in short-term therapy which he claims to have experience in his field for many years, his focus he claims is in the areas of religious conflicts & reframing. As you will read in the following chapter, he isn’t very good at religious conflict resolution, the reframing part needs a little work also. One of his areas of expertise he boasts is Child and Domestic Abuse in the Jewish community, as you will see in the following chapter, he may himself need a little reframing, his speciality is more targeting of the victim and anyone else who bring attention to child abuse within the Jewish community, even Jews.

The masterpiece

The following article is a masterpiece of deception, you’re about to get a beginners guide to Jewish reframing from a self proclaimed expert, you will learn how the Jews use wording and name calling to reframe as they say, the article reads as follows;

Sunday, March 15, 2015
Satanic child abuse is believed by anti-Semites to be a world wide Jewish plot

One of the disturbing issues – in the wild conjecture over Satanic abuse rings which requires believing incredible claims and the paranoia required to digest all of this – is the fact that two can play the same game. If you take Rabbi Berkowitz words about the widespread Satanic (or Christian missionary plot) in Jerusalem – and do some brief searching with Google or Youtube for similar reports – you find a very disturbing thing. It is not hard to find such reports – but there is a twist.

The exact same “facts” and “logic” are used to prove that there is a Jewish pedophile plot involving horrible abuse of children, mind control, government figures blocking investigation, destroying the present world order and wanting to take over the world. If that sounds ridiculous – then why not when Rav Berkowitz says it is a Satanic plot or a Christian plot – with possible police involvement to coverup the facts? And if you acknowledge that it is in truth just as reasonable that it is a Jewish or Satanic plot as a Christian plot or even a Muslem plot or Russian plot or [fill in the blank] – then you need to ask – on what basis do you decide? If standing at the edge of an incredible deep chasm – makes you dizzy when you realize that you are falling into a world of paranoid psychosis – you need to consider the obvious alternative.

The alternative is to climb down from the tree – and to step back from the precipice – before it is too late.
==================================
Let me give a few examples of allegations that Jews are involved in major Satanic abuse rings. (The term “illumanti” found in many of these sites is referring to Jews or people who pretend to be Jews Smololko – who are concerned with dominating the world This is Zionism)

Vicki Pollin- founder of the Awareness Center that focuses on Jewish sexual abuse

Proof that Jews are involved in rituatistic torture of babies comes from Vicki Polins confession on the Oprah show.. See Henry Makow Blog discussing what this says about Jews.

Nachlaot
The Realistic Report uses Tablet Magazine’s debunking of the allegations of Satanic child abuse ring at Nachlaot to prove that Jew are in fact involved in Satanic abuse and the Jewish publications help cover it up.

Former FBI agent Gunderson reveals Illuminati (Jews), Satanism, pedophile rings.

If you want to become paranoid – please listen to this recording by the former head of the L.A. FBI office describing a conspiracy of coverup of widespread child abuse, satanism, corruption of the government including the FBI in dealing with these cases – and he includes the White House. For good measure he was allegedly killed by arsenic poisoning because he exposed the “truth”.

*** LINK TO VIDEO DEAD ***

Jews killed investigators who expose their crimes

The Blog the Common Sense Show says that it is a Zionist plot to killing pedophile investigators

Jews are prominent pedophiles

The blog Jewish Paedophilia argues that Jimmy Savile was a Jew and Jews are prominent pedophiles
===========================================
PLEASE MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE!

(http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2015/03/satanic-child-abuse-is-believed-by-anti.html)

Now you have read through the article and I hope critically analysed what was written, I can now give my analysis of the article. Before I do let me enforce that the following analysis is my personal opinion, you may or may not share that opinion, but I will give it anyway.

My Analysis

The article starts off with a brilliant heading ‘Satanic child abuse is believed by anti-Semites to be a world wide Jewish plot‘. What the author has done intelligently in his reframing process, is connect Satanic child abuse with anti-Semitism. So if you believe through intense research over a period of at least 6 years, working 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year and your research materials gathered over that time period point you to Jewish victims, who say they were forced to participate in ritual child sexual abuse, which includes the sacrifice of children, then you are some how according to the author an anti-Semite. Straight away the author has connected anyone who researches Satanic child sexual abuse with a hatred of Jews and racism, which is quite extreme.

The first part of the first paragraph reads as follows “One of the disturbing issues – in the wild conjecture over Satanic abuse rings which requires believing incredible claims and the paranoia required to digest all of this – is the fact that two can play the same game“.

The next step in the reframing process after connecting a hatred of Jews and racism, is to then say that anything to do with Satanic child abuse is wild conjecture, an out of control theory without sufficient evidence. Even though there are countless victims spanning decades, news reports and perpetrators in prison serving long sentences after a court case found guilty by a jury from all parts of the globe.

The next step in the reframing process is to make you believe that such claims of Satanic ritual abuse are unique events, like it is something that only happens once in a life time, when this couldn’t further from the truth, such claims are common place.

The next step in the reframing process is to make you believe that you have to be paranoid to digest such testimony, there must be something wrong with you if you believe such things happen.

So within the first few lines of the article the Haredim Orthodox Jewish author has said anyone who believes such claims from victims is an anti-Semite who hates Jews, a racist paranoid conspiracy theorist who makes out of control theories without sufficient evidence who has something wrong with them.

With the previous chapter in mind, the first part of the next chapter reads “The exact same “facts” and “logic” are used to prove that there is a Jewish pedophile plot involving horrible abuse of children, mind control, government figures blocking investigation, destroying the present world order and wanting to take over the world“. The next part of the reframing process is to give a cocky general outline of what people who are investigating know without adding in the seriousness of the issue and then again ridicule what is being said with comments like “If that sounds ridiculous” and “when you realize that you are falling into a world of paranoid psychosis“. The author of the article is using his training in psychology against people and the victims of abuse, not in the way his training was meant, to help people.

The author then has the following to say “Let me give a few examples of allegations that Jews are involved in major Satanic abuse rings. (The term “illumanti” found in many of these sites is referring to Jews or people who pretend to be Jews Smololko – who are concerned with dominating the world This is Zionism)“. At no time does the author make the reader aware that Zionism is Jewish fascism and that Zionism and Nazism are one and the same, the same mentality;

israel-palestine_mapsThe author trys to play the moral high ground, failing to tell his readers in order for Israel to exist a race of people had to be genocided and their land stolen from them, men, women and children had to be displaced and murdered. What the Jews have done in Palestine is no different from what Hitler did to Jews in Nazi Germany. At least three million members of Hitlers Nazi Party were registered as either Roman Catholic (offshoot of Christianity) or Evangelical Protestant Christians (offshoot of Judaism), 155,000 Nazi soldiers were Jewish. According to Nazi official Hans Frank, Hitler’s fathers mother was employed as a housekeeper for a Jewish family and the 19 year old son of the family Leopold Frankenberger had fathered Alois Hitlers father. This explains why after Saliva samples were taken from 39 of Hitlers relatives a chromosome found in Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews was found, although some historians dismiss the claim despite mounting evidence that Alois’s father and Hitler were of Jewish stock, because there is reportedly according to Jewish authors no record produced of Leopold Frankenberger’s existence.

At no time does the author make his readers aware that people who fall under the name Illuminati such as Jacob Rothschild, George Soros, the Bush family, the Rockefellers are Jews or Christians. People are trying to turn facts into conspiracy theory, I also have a degree in Computer Science, to reference victim testimony is not conspiracy theory, if it is conspiracy theory, then how come in 6 years not one person has ever brought a law suit for slander? pretty strange don’t you think.

The author then attempts to play down the allegations by pointing everyone’s allegations of a Jewish plot to one victim, he writes “Proof that Jews are involved in ritualistic torture of babies comes from Vicki Polins confession on the Oprah show“. The author makes no attempt to provide any more evidence of victims which makes me wonder where he gained his PhD from, he gives a half arsed attempt to prove his case, in fact what he has done is simply showed himself to be deceptive.

For the story of Vicki see Appendix B at the end of this document.

Another case worth mentioning as an example, Dr Lois Einhorn is from a German Jewish family, she was physically and mentally ritually abused by her mother and father, she was forced to torture her sister and animals using methodologies from Nazi concentration camps. She was told by her father when she was a child, that if she spoke out, she would be killed along with her sister and mother.

She grew up in what would appear a typical Jewish family home on the outside with a dark secret behind closed doors, at certain times of year on religious dates she was brought up to participate in sadistic ritual sex torture with family members. She was given choices such as kill pets that she had raised or torture her sister. She was hypnotized and played anti hypnotic tapes specifically designed to block anyone attempting to recover memories through hypnosis.

For another example see Appendix A at the end of this document.

The next example he gives is something I have never heard of, he writes “The Realistic Report uses Tablet Magazine’s debunking of the allegations of Satanic child abuse ring at Nachlaot to prove that Jew are in fact involved in Satanic abuse and the Jewish publications help cover it up“.

His next example comes in the form of Theodore L. Gunderson an American Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent In Charge and head of the Los Angeles FBI. The author of the best selling book ‘How to Locate Anyone Anywhere‘, a credible source of information who the author tries to ridicule but fails, he writes “If you want to become paranoid – please listen to this recording by the former head of the L.A. FBI office describing a conspiracy of coverup of widespread child abuse, Satanism, corruption of the government including the FBI in dealing with these cases – and he includes the White House. For good measure he was allegedly killed by arsenic poisoning because he exposed the “truth”“. Notice again the author using the term paranoid, attaching anything to do with Satanic child sexual abuse to paranoia, he is using text book disinformation in his attempt at reframing you the reader. The author then comes up with utter lies by claiming Gunderson was killed by arsenic poisoning, he actually died of Cancer according to his son.

His next example is a blog I’ve never read called ‘the Common Sense Show‘, who the author says believes “that it is a Zionist plot to killing pedophile investigators“. If that is true or not I have never heard it although I am aware of child abuse investigators being targeted by government bodies and in Brazil child abuse investigators being murdered, by who, I don’t know.

His final piece of disinformation is to claim that this blog “argues that Jimmy Savile was a Jew and Jews are prominent pedophiles“. I don’t claim Jimmy Savile was a Jew, Savile was a Roman Catholic Satanist according to the mainstream media and according to one Jewish source, Henry Makow, Savile was of Jewish descent. This line of investigation is still open, I make no claims that anything on this blog is true, because I have to depend on other people as a reference and you can’t always depend on other people to be telling the truth. I do what I was trained to do in university, provide the source of the claim, provide the source of where I got my information from.

Conclusion

As you can see the author of the article analysed above has done nothing but tell lies, name call, and done zero research. That the author has a PhD in psychology, if true, is shocking to say the least. I don’t take his article serious, it is up to you if you take him serious. I put his writing down as a clear attempt at reframing people who won’t bother to dig deep and take the time to pick apart his claims. He is an idiot and an extremist, anyone who has gone to him for help is the ones we should feel sorry for, they clearly won’t have got the support they deserve from such a dick. I was thinking about writing more but I refuse to waste any more time even thinking about such an idiot, my advice to you is go pick apart his article for yourself, once you understand what he is trying to do ie reframe thought, you will wish you never bothered wasting your time even reading his shite.

On closing, it wouldn’t surprise me if the author of the disinformation above turned out to actually be a paedophile, take into consideration Jewish paedophile Amir Ish Hurwitz headed worlds largest online paedophile ring 70,000 members. Let us not forget the extreme views of Israeli rabbi Yitzhak Shapira who in 2009 published a book ‘The King’s Torah‘ in which he writes that it is permissible for Jews to kill non-Jews including children. The book clearly states “There is a reason to kill babies [on the enemy side] even if they have not transgressed the seven Noahide Laws because of the future danger they may present, since it is assumed that they will grow up to be evil like their parents“. Let us not forget the murder of an 8 year old boy in a snuff movie known as the ‘London Tape’ by Jew Beat Meier, or the time in 2000 when 11 jewish gangsters were arrested by Italian police, they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children aged between two and five from orphanages, and then raping and murdering them on tape. Another Jewish paedophile allegedly involved in child murder is former head of British police, Special Branch and MI5, Leon Brittan or what about Jewish paedophile Freemason Greville Janner. Last but not least, most members of the Temple of Set are Jewish, Set being the Egyptian religions devil and further more, Anton LaVey who created the Church of Satan was also Jewish according to his own authorized biography written by his wife, LaVey was involved in Zionist gun running, I could go on, but I won’t.

If the author wants to pin the label anti-Semite on me then that is his choice, but he’s flogging a dead horse, if fighting against Jewish paedophiles having sex with children is anti-Semitism, I would rather be an anti-Semite than a child molester any day. Instead of the author living with his head up his ring piece, he should try changing his odd dress code and mixing in with the rest of the world and he wouldn’t see ritual child abuse as something bizarre, because it is common place in the western world.

For anyone who wants to look at a few other cases of Jewish child abuse see the following link, it may be of help in your illumination https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2014/11/25/jewish-paedophilia/

Appendix A

David Shurter was born December 6th 1966 into a Satanic Jewish family, who forced him to participate in paedophilia, electroshock torture, human sacrifice, ritual torture, bestiality and cannibalism. His father was a high priest in a Satanic coven. Shurter says that Michael Aquino was his main handler, it was Aquino who would do almost all of the torture under the US government MKUltra program. He says that he has met hundreds of victims who were involved in MKUltra child abuses.

At age 10 he was forced to participate in murder, he was buried alive as a child with a corpse, and was witness to other children being buried alive, some of which were left to die.

Shurter had multiple siblings, he says that he believes that his older brother was his families first born sacrifice, he also believes that his sister Cindy was murdered because of what she was about to tell him about past abuses. Shurter had another brother, Steven, who was a paedophile, he was a photographer who would often bring home pictures of dead bodies.

As a child he was taught how to murder children using daggers, he was taught how to cut up and dispose of the bodies. He recalls times when he cut up, up to 3 children in a night, then drink the childs blood. He recalls children being disemboweled and made to watch them die as they screamed.

In 1979 Shurter recalls a time when he was 10 years old, he had a female childhood friend who had gone missing, her father came to Shurters family home looking for his daughter. The man was invited into the house where he was drugged, tied up, dowsed in a flammable liquid and then Shurter was made to set him alight. The man woke up from his drugged state and began screaming, his father took a shovel and stuck it into the mans stomach.

Shurter says that he believes his father was involved in the murder of multiple children after his father told him that he had committed crimes against children. He says that he believes his father was involved in the disappearance of Johny Gosh, Jacob Wetterling, Ricky Chadick, and Eugene Martin. He believes this because his family owned the same vehicles used in the disappearance as well as because of a systematic cover up by the US government and the CIA.

Another time Shurter recalls seeing a child being thrown out of a plane while still alive to keep him quiet.

As a child he would play hide and seek, the rule of the game, if you are found, you are murdered. Shurter says, looking back, that the adults knew who they were going to murder, while hiding you could hear the screams of the children being tortured and killed.

Shurter recalls a time in a chapel built by Freemasons where children were sacrificed. Children were either cremated or buried alive with a corpse.

Shurters family had connections to reported child murdering paedophile Warren Buffett. He says that Warren Buffett and George Herbert Walker Bush were deeply involved in the Franklin coverup.

Appendix B

On May 1st, 1989, a Jewish woman by the name of Vicki Polin appeared on the Oprah show where she said that she was born into a multi generational satanic Jewish family who participated in devil worship. She was made to participate in incest, ritual abuse, cannibalism and ritual human sacrifice. At certain times of year on religious dates she was also brought up to participate in sadistic ritual sex torture with family members. Vicki says that members of her family bred children to be sacrificed, she was made to kill an infant as a child during a ritual ceremony as a way to gain power. Vicky says that because of the trauma she was forced to participate in, she ended up with Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)/Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), that was another purpose of the child sacrifice, to develop DID in the person. She says that her family kept a family tree of the people who had participated in ritual abuse throughout the generations. Vicky also says that other Jewish families participate in ritual sacrifice, although not all Jewish families ritually murder children.

Appendix C

from THE JEWISH RELIGION: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling
V.
TALMUDIC IMMORALITY, ASININITY AND PORNOGRAPHY: THE REPROBATE MIND

Chapter Summary

[page 22] St. Paul, who had been a Pharisee, often bores Christians who do not know what he was arguing about, in his discourses haranguing Pharisees. But one familiar with the Talmud can appreciate his diatribe against the “uncleanness” of those, “Who changed the truth of God into a lie” and: “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,” until “God gave them over to a reprobate mind … Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness …” (Romans 1:22, 25, 28).
Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth (Exhibit 155) that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: “When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go.” Footnote: “Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place.” Further footnote: “Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, there fore, be suspected.”

From a Roof

The Talmud book of Yebamoth also concerns the duty to marry a brother’s widow who is childless. Two volumes of junk and obscenity for its own sake carry the title, Yebamoth. Another illustration of the “reprobate mind” is the teaching that [Yebamoth 54a] if a man falls from a roof “and his fall resulted in accidental insertion,” as [Ybamoth 54a footnote] “When in a state of erection the levir fell from a raised bench upon his sister-in-law who happened to be below.” Here the great Talmudic “saint” Rashi is cited as authority. “His commentary on the Talmud is a consummate masterpiece, a remarkable and gigantic work,” says the 1943 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. Rashi was born in Troyes, France, 1040, and died there in 1105.

The above Talmud passage is not reproduced here. It is in Yebamoth 53b-54a (page 356 of the Soncino edition) and continues the above with the responsibility of a “levir” or brother-in-law “when, for instance, his intention was intercourse with his wife and his sister-in-law seized him and he cohabited with her.” [Yebamoth 54a] The passage is merely an excuse to indulge the “reprobate mind” in uncleanness. (Romans 1:28) Is it any wonder that Christ likened Pharisees to “unseen graves” (Luke 11) and “whited sepulchres” (Matt. 23)?

Bestiality

Although Moses commanded that if a woman have intercourse with a beast, both should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry a harlot or woman who is profane (Lev. 21:7), the Talmud teaches that “unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest,” since then “you will find no woman eligible …” (See Exhibit 157, from the Talmud book of Yebamoth, Folios 59a-59b)

Rulings of the “sages” follow: “A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest — even a High Priest.” Unless specifically warned in advance and the act seen by two witnesses, she is acceptable also. If she had intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure, and suitable. For, “The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not regard such as intercourse either.” (See Exhibit 158)

This alone gives a fair idea of the systematic deformation of Scripture by the Pharisees and the truthfulness of Christ’s denunciations about their making God’s commandments of none effect by their Tradition. (Matthew 15:6)

Babies

Baby boys may always be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men, according to the Talmud. (See Exhibit 54) The Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until a child reaches sexual maturity, capable of sexual intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy (pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud “nine years and one day” is the fictitious age of male maturity.
Likewise, under “nine years and one day,” the “first stage of intercourse” of a boy with the mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Talmudically. Shammai, to seem more “strict,” lowers the age to eight years in some cases. (See Exhibit 82 from Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)

A long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced) a woman gets if her virginity was removed by a young boy, fills Kethuboth I lb of the Talmud. [page 23] (See Exhibit 136 and Exhibit 137) And here, the foul mother may be reckoned “pure,” depending on the age of the child. Such degrading use of children was typical of paganism throughout the ancient world.

“When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this — that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger into the eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (See Exhibit 136, Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)

This is the standard doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse with babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast to Christ’s beautiful teachings concerning little children.

The following is also typical concerning the fictitious age of sexual maturity of baby girls set by the Pharisee “sages:” “A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition …” See Exhibit 55 (Sanhedrin 55b), Exhibit 81 (Sanhedrin 69a-69b), Exhibit 156 (Yebamoth 57b), and Exhibit 159 (Yebamoth 60b); also Niddah 44b.

Baby girls of three can invoke sadistic punishments on those who have intercourse with them when they are “Niddahs” (menstruating), a physical impossibility, of course. (Talmud, Sanhedrin 55b – Exhibit 55; Sanhedrin 69a – Exhibit 81)

And, at three, a baby girl is always rated as “one who is fit for cohabitation — that is one who has attained the age of three years and one day.” (Talmud, Yebamoth 60b, Exhibit 159) But, in the case of a baby girl who is not Jewish-born, or a so-called “proselyte,” she may be “married” thus by a grown priest: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest;” although “one who is fit for cohabitation,” as stated on the same page, is “one who has attained the age of three years and one day.” (See Exhibit 159)

This Talmud Yebamoth passage continues with the ruling in the case of a baby under three married to a grown man priest, and declared eligible to continue as his wife. (See Exhibit 160) The baby girl was a “proselyte,” of course, so age did not matter. But “under eleven years and one day” a little girl “carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.” (See Exhibit 152, Yebamoth 12b of the Talmud)
Adultery is permitted with the wife of a minor, and wife of a non-Jew. (See Exhibit 53) The pretense is that a minor not being a “man” yet, and the non-Jew having non-human status, Talmudically, the Biblical law does not apply.

Thus, once again do the Pharisees make the commandments of God of “none effect” as Christ said. (Matthew 15:6, Mark 7:13)

Incest

Moses ordered the priests that: “They shall not take a wife that is a whore, or profane … for he is holy unto his God.” (Leviticus 21:7) The laws against incest are most vehement: “The nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother … (Leviticus 18:7) And in the Talmud the Pharisee “sages” reverse these Biblical injunctions:

“If a woman sported lewdly with her young son, a minor and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her — Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit to the Priesthood.” Here a footnote explains that she could not marry a priest, if this made her profane and the above Leviticus 21:7 is cited precisely. (See Exhibit 82)

We then learn that the dispute concerns only the age of the son, not the lewdness of the foul mother: “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and one day is a real connection whilst that of one less than eight years is not [Footnote: “So that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood, whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shamnmai agree that she is not.”] Here silliness reigns supreme, and one understands why Christ called the Pharisees “fools and blind:” “Beth Shammai maintaining, we must base our ruling on the earlier generations” [Footnote states: “When a boy of that age could cause conception.”] “but Hillel holds that we do not.”
The supposition that boys became fathers at eight is the silly excuse for the Shammai school to argue that the boy must be under eight to leave the mother pure. The standard throughout the Jewish Talmud is that a little boy becomes a person, “sexually mature,” at nine years and one day, — another asininity. The whole argument strains at the “gnat” of age and “swallows the camel” of incest between mother and son. (Matthew 23:24)

Incest with Lot

The Bible tells us that after the destruction of Sodom with all of its inhabitants, except Lot and his two daughters who took refuge in a cave: “The firstborn said unto the younger, our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us … Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve the seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.” The next night the same events took place for the younger: “Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.” (Genesis 19:31-8) The abominating tribes of Moabiteg and Ammonites were the products of these two sons, at first spared, then demolished by the fourth king of Judah, Jehosaphat. (11 Chron. 20)

But the Talmudic “Sages” take anything but a critical view of this incest:

“A man should always be as alert as possible to perform a precept, for as a reward for anticipating the younger by one night, the elder daughter of Lot was privileged to appear in the genealogical record of the royal household of Israel four generations earlier.” (See Exhibit 166, Nazir 23b-24a of the Talmud)

Nieces

The Jewish press in 1954 reported attempts to alter state laws so as to legalize marriages between uncle and niece, which is common in rabbinical circles. The Bible prohibits marriages between uncles and aunts, and with nieces and nephews, as incest. (Lev. 18:13,14).

Under “Talmudic Eugenics” in Baron’s A Social and Religious History of the Jews (Jewish Publication Society, 1952), is this on incest: “In Egypt the Ptolemaic rulers themselves, for the most part, married their own sisters. In Parthia-Persia, marriages between parents and children were valid, and those among brothers and sisters were quite customary. [page 24] The Parsee religion … encouraged such marriages as the fittest means of preserving family purity [cf. ‘Yasna’ 12, 9] … Artaxerxes 11 had married his two daughters, and … Mithraidates I had married his mother. Ardea Viraz is said to have married his seven sisters.” (page 229, Volume 11) This was not harmful, we are told!

“On one point, particularly, Roman law differed from Jewish: marriages between an uncle and a niece. We recall that both Rabbi Eliezer and Abba married nieces, as did Rabbi Jose the Galilean … Rabbi Ishmael made a special effort to overrule his vow [not to marry his own niece] and to make the niece more attractive to him by improving her teeth …” (page 230, same)

Moses commanded in God’s name, that a woman should not marry her uncle, or a man his aunt. (Lev. 18:14) Nevertheless, today these “People of the Book” are striving to modify American state laws against such marriages, and have actually been successful in some states, on the ground that their “religion” requires such latitude.

Harlots and Dogs

The creative powers were worshipped in all ancient pagan countries as the procreative powers of male and female, with sex rites to match. Men who became priests to the female goddess Venus, Mylitta, Astarte, or by whatever name, in a wild orgy of drugged frenzy would castrate themselves with “sacred swords” and then contribute part of their earnings as sodomists to the upkeep of the pagan cult and temple, and would train, sell and rent dogs for immoral purposes. Girls who became priestesses to the pagan temples earned their keep and contributed to a cult’s upkeep through their earnings as “sacred prostitutes.”

But Moses taught that the worship of God was not to be maintained on such earnings. “Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the Lord thy God for any vow: for even both of these are abomination unto the Lord thy God.” (Deuteronomy 23:18)

The Talmud, citing Deuteronomy 23:19, makes this out of the ruling: “There is not adultery in connection with an animal, because it is written, ‘Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog,’ etc., and it has been taught: ‘The hire of a dog and the wages of a harlot’ are permissible, as it is said, ‘Even both of these are an abomination unto the Lord’ —the two specified in the text are abominations but not four.” Then the permission is given to use for the temple: “Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal adultery. If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered.” (Sotah 26b Talmud, Exhibit 168)

Abodah Zarah of the Talmud takes up this same “matter of a harlot’s hire which is permitted — To be devoted to the Temple, in spite of the Law of Deut. XXIII, 19.” (actually, verse 18) The man is permitted to do this: “If he gave her it [the money] and subsequently had intercourse with her, or had intercourse with her and subsequently gave it to her, the hire is permitted. The two matters are regarded as separate and what she received is legally a gift.” This argument goes on for two pages. (See Exhibit 190 and Exhibit 191)

No wonder that Christ charged that the Pharisees nullified the commandments of God by their Tradition, which now, in written form, has become the Talmud.

Permissible Adultery and Intercourse with the Dead

“None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the Lord,” says the Book (Lev. 18:6). Scripture references are also cited which denounce a married woman who lies “carnally” with a man not her husband. But say the sages: “That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum since no fertilization can possibly result. This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated.” And other Talmud sources are cited. “The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman [Footnote 15] even though she died as a married woman.” Thus one is “exonerated” for, or permitted, intercourse with dead relatives or with relatives, married or single, “with a relaxed membrum,” because “no fertilization can possibly result.” (Talmud, Yebamoth 55b, See Exhibit 163)

Intercourse with dead bodies was an old pagan practice. The above is echoed with some variation in “the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud,” the book of Sanhedrin. (See Exhibit 89)

There the act of sodomy with one suffering with an incurable disease, hence regarded as already dead, or a “terefah,” is held to be merely “as one who abuses a dead person, and hence exempt.” The explanation, which continues on the next page (not reproduced) is: “Punishment is generally imposed because of the forbidden pleasure derived — [footnote] Whereas there is no sexual gratification in abusing the dead.”

How apt it was when Christ called the Talmudic Pharisees “whited sepulchres … full of all uncleanness.” (Matt. 23) Yet some of His followers call these abominators of every decency “God’s Chosen People” and “People of the Book”!

Polygamy

There is nothing now, as formerly, in Talmudic doctrine, against polygamy. It is practiced by Jews in countries where it is allowed.

A 1952 book by Salo Wittmayer Baron, Professor of Jewish History, Literature and Institutions of the Miller Foundation, Columbia University, is entitled, A Social and Religious History of the Jews and is published by the American Jewish Committee’s Jewish Publication Society of America. The chapter, “The World of the Talmud,” cites the harem of King Solomon (which finished him morally and otherwise), saying its “memory kindled the imagination of polygamous Jews in subsequent ages.” Although we are told [page 25] that there was no real difference between Palestinian and Babylonian Jewries fundamentally, the book states “there are indications that Babylonian Jewish society had more polygamous features than did that of Palestine.”

And: “Anecdotes like those current in regard to Rab and Rabbi Nahman [who] after arriving in a foreign city they used to advertise for women ready to marry them for the time of their sojourn (‘man havya le-yoma’) … In law, too, the Babylonian emphasis lay upon the Jew’s right to ‘marry as many wives as he is able to support.’”

It was Rabbi Gershorn Ben Judah (bom Metz, 960; died Mayence, France 1040), whose edicts were accepted by European Jewry as final for all time, who commanded Jews in Christian countries to stop getting into trouble with the law by polygamy.
Israel first proposed extra allowances for plural wives but now seems to be screening polygamy from Christian eyes.

After the period of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and before this, in the case of Adam and Noah, monogamy ruled. The Prophets were monogamists. Moses commanded regarding a man of God that: “Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away. …” (Deuteronomy 17:17) And, admittedly, the polygamy of David and his son Solomon ended the Israel twelve-tribe united Kingdom. Their hordes of pagan wives, and foul, pagan altars broke down any Godly spirit which had formerly united them. However, reversing the Bible once again, Pharisee “Sages” embroider upon the above words of Moses against polygamy, their permission to have 18, 24, or 48 wives. (Talmud, Sanhedrin 20b-21a) The Mishna asks: “Why then is it written, neither shall he multiply wives to himself … Rabbi Simeon said: He must not marry even one who may turn away his heart — From which it might be inferred that he may marry a lesser number even if they should corrupt him.”
The Jewish Talmud and Legally

Murdering Your Neighbor

As noted elsewhere, regarding murder of the non-Jew, it is good and meritorious, providing you do not get caught and thus get the Talmudic religion exposed for what it is.

However, permissible murder in Judaism embraces more than just killing Gentiles. Murder by suffocation is permissible. Here shyster hairsplitting is inserted in the Talmud, it being permissible to seal up a neighbor in an airtight “alabaster chamber,” providing one does not put in a lighted candle to help eat up the oxygen, but merely allowing the victim to expire by breathing the oxygen up himself unaided, this is acceptable. (See Exhibit 86 from Sanhedrin 77a-77b of the Talmud)

Under Talmudic “law” other forms of murder are also permissible:

Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of starvation. Just bind up the neighbor before it is hot or cold enough to kill him and all is well — you are guiltless of what follows. (See Exhibit 85)

Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of sunstroke. (See Exhibit 85)
Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of cold. (See Exhibit 85)
Binding up your neighbor so that a lion may kill him. (See Exhibit 85) He could not have fought the lion anyway, so, it is acceptable, says the Talmud.

Letting mosquitoes bite your neighbor to death. As for the mosquitoes, they come and go, so, since the ones which bit him when you tied the victim go away and others end his life, you are pure and blameless. (See Exhibit 85)

Throwing your neighbor into a pit and leaving him to die there. (See Exhibit 86)

Killing your neighbor with arrow wounds. (See Exhibit 86) Shooting the neighbor with an arrow is acceptable, since if there is balsam for sale somewhere, he presumably could have sent for some and thus have been cured instead of dying. (See Exhibit 86)

You can also drown your neighbor and yet be “guiltless” of his death! Remember to follow Talmudic law, however, and cause the water to travel a little distance before it drowns the neighbor — then you are guiltless of his death! (See Exhibit 87)

Ten “Innocent” Murderers

It is granted in the Talmud that the Bible forbids taking a man’s life — but that merely means taking his life all by yourself. In other words, you must not take the whole of his life all alone, which permits you, nevertheless, to help nine other men to take a life.

Thus, it is stated in the Talmud: “If ten men smote a man with ten staves whether simultaneously or successively, and he died, they are exempt.” Answering the Rabbi who suggests that killing whatever is left of a man’s life might be wrong, we are also told: “If ten men assailed him successively, he was already nearly dead when the last smote him: therefore the last, too, is exempt.” (See Exhibit 88)

“Mercy” Killings Approved

Elaborate pains were taken, rather recently, by Rabbis to deny that “mercy” killings are permitted in Judaism — because they are. The public discussion was on whether or not a hopelessly sick person should be put out of his misery. The Rabbis denied that would be proper, necessarily know ng that the Talmud states otherwise. The Talmud, Sanhedrin 77b-78a, contains these rabbinical edicts:

“Both agree that if he killed a Terefah [explained in a footnote as ‘a person suffering from some fatal organic disease, recovery from which is impossible’] — he is exempt.” And: “If one kills a Terefah, he is exempt; whilst if a Terefah committed murder: if in the presence of a Beth Din [i.e. a Talmudic law court] he is liable; otherwise he is exempt.” (See Exhibit 88 and Exhibit 89)

Cursing and Striking Parents

“Honor thy Father and thy Mother.” So states the Commandment.
[page 26] The Bible, through Moses, teaches that anyone who strikes or curses his parents is worthy of death.

But the Pharisee “Sages” have nullified that. One may strike parents without wounding them, while they are alive, but there are no limitations upon striking them after death! (See Exhibit 94)
Jews may curse their parents providing they use any term meaning God. (See Exhibit 74) Excepted are the Y-H-W-H consonants of the word Jehovah, called the Tetragrammaton, and which is reserved for use in summoning demons.

As for the “sacredness” of the Tetragrammaton word for Jehovah, the word God is frequently written “G-d.” The Tetragrammaton written in full is reserved for the use of Rabbinical potentates, the Hassidist Baal (Master) Shem (of the Name of God), who by using 14, 42, 72 letter combinations of the name is supposedly able to invoke spirits. At the beginning of the century, according to authorities, about half of Jewry was Hassidist.

The word “God” is not supposed to be written or spoken even today, and the California Jewish Voice, for example, carries articles in which the word is spelled “G-D” throughout. Not piety but sheer superstition governs this.

One of Christ’s major “crimes” was that He pronounced the Name as spelled. (See Exhibit 56, from Sanhedrin 55b-56a of the Talmud) It is there explained in a footnote that “Bless” is used in the text instead of the right term “Curse,” typifying Talmudic double-talk.

Moses said that anyone who cursed or struck mother or father should be put to death. (Exodus 21:15,17; Leviticus 20:9; Deuteronomy 27:16)

“But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say a gift (Or I have dedicated to God that which would relieve your need) … ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother: making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have … delivered, and many such like things ye do.” (Mark 7:1-13) Matthew 15 contains like denunciations.
In Matthew 13 and Mark 7, Christ asked the Pharisees: “Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? For God commanded, saying, Honor thy father and thy mother and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.”

Then Christ reminded them of the Pharisee custom of dedicating their goods to the Temple, then telling their needy parents that what they might have given them is now the property of God and they must do without, although they themselves went on using the proceeds of their wealth for themselves.

Christ was hated by the pagan Pharisees for such teachings as:

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven … except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:17-20)

The Talmud Book of Gittin And Some Health Remedies

This Talmud book is about divorce. Reproduced herein are the title page (Exhibit 199) and part of the introduction (Exhibit 200). The book also deals with the fate of Christians in Hell. (See, for example, Exhibit 201 and Exhibit 202.) Following are also various dog and dung health remedies. Exhibit 205, Exhibit 206, Exhibit 207, Exhibit 208, and Exhibit 209 are reproductions from Gittin, Folios 69a-70b, devoted to these dung and dog remedies almost too fantastic to believe. The privy, demons and privates are mingled in insane array.

The funny thing about the horrendous and silly “remedies” of the Talmud book of Gittin, is not the asininity of the remedies themselves so much as the commentary, in English, by a British doctor with a string of alleged degrees, which appears in the Appendix to the Soncino edition of this Talmud book. He actually attempts to justify and praise these nutty things! The wrong people, it is often said, are in asylums.

The “Appendix” (not reproduced) is entitled: “Notes On The Various Remedies Recommended in Folios 68b-70b,” by W. M. Feldman, MD, FRCP, Lond., FRAS, FRS.”

For the “Charms, Amulets, Incantations, Astrological associations,” he finds the benefits of “suggestion” with “profound effect,” and for whatever he cannot evolve a “rational physical basis,” he invents imagined benefits. He points out that “animal excrements as remedial agents” are ancient and we “shall not lightly dismiss the ancient folk remedies — however absurd they may appear.” He extolls the incantations and lauds these Rabbis’ “knowledge of all parts of theoretical and practical medicine, in which they surpassed their contemporaries …” He refers to several works to study the glories of “Talmudic Medicine” in five pages of whitewash, professing to look down upon “the probable sneers of the sophisticated, but untutored reader,” which should include just about everyone except a Talmudist zealot.

Use of the Bible for Asininity and Obscenity

One is enlightened as to Christ’s denunciations of the Pharisees as “fools and blind” (Matthew 23, etc.) by the following so-called “wisdom of the sages:

Adam’s words about Eve are cited in the Bible: “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh …” a statement Christ used in His teachings about marriage. (Matthew 19:3-6) But the Jewish Talmud teaches:

“What is meant by the Scriptural text, ‘This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my fleshT (Genesis 2:23) This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with [page 27] Eve.” (See Exhibit 161, Yebamoth 63a, of the Talmud)

David’s 6th psalm is a plea by David for forgiveness: “Return, 0, Lord, deliver my soul: oh save me for thy mercies sake … in the grave who shall give thee thanks?”

“I am weary with my groaning; all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears.” Citing the above verse, Psalm 6:7, the Talmud “sages” make this to be the meaning: “Even during David’s illness he fulfilled the conjugal rights of his eighteen wives, as it is written, ‘I am weary with my groaning: all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears.’” (See Exhibit 116, from Sanhedrin 107a of the Talmud)

Women who are “unclean” (menstruating) are to remain separate, said Moses, “all the days of her issue,” and this verse (Leviticus 15:26) is cited in the Jewish Talmud, which states, “that a woman is not regarded as a ‘zabah’ [one with a discharge] except during the daytime because it is written, ‘all the days of her issue.’” (See Exhibit 194, from Horayoth 4a of the Talmud)

Typical of the Talmud misuse of the Bible for purposes of inventing obscenity and then giving it a Biblical coating, is the Biblical account about Sisera, head of the Canaanite army, who fights all day and is the only man left alive. He flees to the tent of a supposed friend of the Canaanites, Heber the Kenite. Jael, Heber’s wife, welcomes him in but as soon as he falls into exhausted sleep drives a tent nail through his temple and he dies. She boasts of this to his pursuing captors. Next, Deborah makes up a song of rejoicing in which she embroiders on Sisera’s actual death in his sleep (Judges 4:2 1) and with poetic license sings: “When she had stricken through his temples — at her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay down: at her feet he bowed, he fell, where he bowed, there he fell down dead.” (Judges 5:27) The verbs “bowed” and “fell” are used three times each, and “lay” is used once. This makes seven verbs used in this verse.

The standard Talmud use of this verse is to indicate it as meaning “seven sexual connections.” The same Biblical verse is used thus about Christ. The words: “at her feet he bowed, he fell” are explained as: “Judges 5:27. This is taken to refer to sexual intercourse …” (See Exhibit 108, San hedrin 105a-b of the Talmud)

This is rehashed in Yebarnoth 103a-103b of the Jewish Talmud: “That profligate — Sisera — had seven sexual connections on that day for it is said, ‘Between her feet he sunk, he fell, he lay: at her feet he sunk, he fell; where he sunk, there he fell down dead,” with the footnote giving the Talmudic reasoning: “Each of the expressions ‘he sunk,’ and ‘he fell,’ occurs three times, and ‘he lay’ occurs once.” (See Exhibit 162)

The Talmud book of Nazir reiterates the same Biblical misuse for no reason whatever: “That wicked wretch, Sisera, had sevenfold intercourse with Jael at that time, as it says, ‘At her feet he sunk, he fell, he lay,’ etc. — The words ‘he sunk,’ ‘he fell’ occur three times, and the words ‘he lay,’ once. Judges V,27.” (Exhibit 165, from Nazir 23b, of the Talmud)

The Talmud book of Horayoth repeats the same obscenity. (See Exhibit 195)

Farming Inferior for Jews

In the course of a terrible prophecy against Tyre, the New York of the ancient world, and reprobate with sodomy, lesbianism, child-burning, and other abominations, is a Bible verse foretelling that “all that handle the oar, the mariners, and all the pilots of the sea, shall come down from their ships; they shall stand upon the land.” (Ezekiel 27:29) The prophecy, including all the details of the preceding chapter were literally fulfilled by Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great. Nebuchadnezzar pounded down the walls of Tyre and Alexander made a causeway of the rocks, killing or selling into slavery the inhabitants, who had taken refuge on an island off shore.

However, the Talmud nullifies and twists these Biblical words, and out of the words foretelling the end of the seagoing trading power, coming “down from their ships they shall stand upon the land,” the Pharisee Talmud “sages” state: “No occupation is inferior to that of agricultural labor, for it is said, ‘they shall come down.”  (From Yebamoth 63a of the Talmud – See Exhibit 161)

Talmud Instructions for the Sabbath

No Talmud book illustrates Christ’s depictions of Pharisaism better than the book of Sabbath. He said: “Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.” (Matthew 23:24)

One way to go raving crazy is to study the Talmud book of Sabbath with its rules on what is or what is not permissible on the Sabbath.

Concerning the Sabbath, even the digested laws, or Talmud Mishna in the Schulhan Aruch, take up 82 pages of Volume 2 (pages 63-145). The sum and substance of all of them is a game of subversion. A rule is set up. “How many ways are there to get around it and nullify it?” That is the problem, leading to almost endless trivia and discussion.

Moving a Door Key

One gem concerns the weighty problem of the door key which the “shabbos goy,” or a Sabbath gentile, is carrying home for you so that the Jew is spared that “labor. ”

The Talmud rule is that you cannot move goods from one category of property to another; from private to public property or from what is neither public or private, on the Sabbath. Your doorstep is neither public nor private. The street or sidewalk outside the doorstep is public; your house inside is private. Therefore, says the Talmud, you must have the “goy” not only insert your key in the lock, but push the door in as, otherwise, if you pushed the door in with the key in it, you would be moving the key from property neither public nor private (the sill) to the inside of the house (private property).
[page 28]

The Sabbath Louse-Hunt

“One who searches his garments and finds a louse shall not crack it, but simply rub it with his fingers and throw it away on the Sabbath.” (See Exhibit 6) Throwing away lice is not “labor.” Cracking a louse is to be avoided at all costs, however.

Sabbath Intercourse

The bloody, the sadistic, and the obscene are the darlings of the Talmudic “synagogue of Satan” mentality, the appetite for which is seemingly never sated. To illustrate, eight running pages have been reproduced here on the popular Talmud subjects of blood and intercourse. This discourse concerns whether or not the first intercourse on the Sabbath would constitute Sabbath “labor.” “Is it performed to see if she was a virgin?”, is discussed at length, for example. But the rule which governs is the dominant Talmud rule of the Sabbath on the subject of labor, namely that an act of injury never ranks as “labor.” So, if the intent is to injure the wife the act is permissible. (See Exhibit 122, Talmud book of Kethuboth 5b-6a)

The eighth page ends with the thought that intercourse is permitted anyway. Then a new line of needless, senseless “religious” discussions about women and blood starts in. These longwinded, silly pages of Pharisee “wisdom” are but a sample of the bent of the whole Talmud. (See Exhibit 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, and 141)
Vows

In Matthew 5:34-6, and in Matthew 23:16-22 are recorded the lambastings Christ gave the Pharisees for vowings: “ye blind guides which say, whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it he is guilty. Ye fools and blind: for which is greater the gift or the altar that sanctified the gift?” Christ goes on to illustrate Pharisee silliness. Do not swear by anything, is the gist of the Matthew 5:34 passage, not by your head for you cannot “make one hair white or black.”

One can only appreciate His words after reading hundreds of pages of drivel about vows in the Talmud books of Nazir and Nedarim. (Title pages, Exhibit 164 and Exhibit 170)

The Talmud Mishna on the Heifer and the Door is illustrative (not reproduced). The Mishna opens with the Door saying if the man doesn’t open it, and the heifer saying if the man does not make it stand up, he must be a “Nazir.” (A Nazirite [to vow] was one who had vowed not to cut his hair or drink or eat any product of the grape for a certain time.) Three pages of haranguing “Gemara” following the Talmud . . “Mishna” discuss the fact that the heifer then got up of its own volition. The door is quiet, apparently, for nothing more is said by it. The Jewish school of Shammai holds that since the man did not of his own power force the heifer up, he must be a “Nazir,” but the Hillel Jews say that the essence of the vow is the upping of the heifer which was “recumbent” and is now standing up, so the man does not have to be a “Nazir.” The schools of the Hillel and Shammai were in full flower in the Holy Land when Christ lived and, no doubt, this and other nonsense presently preserved for the Jewish religion, existed then.

Talmud — Juvenile Birth Control and the “Two Hairs” Test for Puberty

The Talmud, Yebamoth 12b, harangues about the ages when female birth control may be exercised, namely from “the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day,” with a child “under or over” these ages to “carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.” The recommended birth control is to be followed because otherwise the pregnant female might have a “second conception” which would make her fetus a “sandal” or “flat fish.” Read the nonsense, followed by the “two hairs” test. (See Exhibit 152)

Read the asinine harangue in the Talmud, Yebamoth 12b 13a (See Exhibit 153), about two hairs proving puberty, or not proving it, as the child may have lost the two hairs through childbirth, also, the calling for an examination by the Rabbis. In the Soncino edition of the Talmud, reference is made to three similar messes of muck in Kethuboth 36a, Baba Bathra 156a and Niddah 52a of the Talmud.
To be unable to tell whether a little girl is as yet adolescent, or has borne a child or not, by counting two pubic hairs, is too idiotic to credit to anything except the Talmudic love of sub-sewer subjects — “the reprobate mind,” as Paul called it, “Who changed the truth of God into a lie.” (Romans 1:25, 28)
To deal in unnatural filth and sex matters is the core of Talmudic “scholarship.”

More Talmudic “Wisdom”

Pretensions of “wisdom” by Talmudic Pharisee “sages” are perhaps the most incredible. No pompous dissertation seems complete without mention of a privy. Sons of “sages” and scholars, we read may “enter and sit down before their father, with their backs to the people.”

When, however, they do not possess the capability of understanding the discourses, “they enter and sit down before their father with their faces toward the public … if he went out to ease himself he may re-enter and sit down in this place … This applies only to the minor functions of the body but not to the major functions since he should have examined himself before … A man should always make a habit of easing himself early in the morning and late in the evening in order that there be no need for him to go far …” (See Exhibit 197 and Exhibit 198)

Jewish Talmud “remedies” are foolish to say the least. The above passage from Horayoth 13a-b of the Talmud is replete with learning such as: “As the olive causes one to forget seventy years of study, so does olive oil restore seventy years of study … Wine and spices have made me wise.” (Exhibit 96)
The Talmud “sages” then dispute whether dipping one or two fingers in salt makes one wise; whether passing under the [page 29] bit of a camel, or under the camel itself, interferes most with mentality. The text then returns to the required protocol for the “Nasi, head of the Sanhedrin, and the head of a Talmud school, the Ab-Beth Din,” and how many rows have to rise in honor when each one enters. (Exhibit 197)

The Talmud also has “wisdom about eating dates.” “They remove three things: evil thoughts, stress of the bowels, and abdominal trouble.” This leads to a play on words, door, ladder and bed, where “one is fruitful and multiplies on it” — back to the old subjects. This is from Kethuboth 10b-11a of the Talmud.

On this same page is the Mishnah (law) that a baby girl under three years and one day old is always reckoned as a virgin: “If they had intercourse before they were three years and one day old the hymen would grow.”

Do not just the few illustrations above from the Pharisee Talmud show the justness of Christ’s excoriations of the Pharisees as: “Full of all uncleanness;” their love of the “uppermost rooms at feasts. . . all their works they do for to be seen of men” — “full of hypocrisy and iniquity?” (Matthew 23:5-6, 27-8, etc.)

And, illustrating their hairsplitting paraded as “wisdom,” He called them “fools and blind.” (Matthew 23:17-19)

Virginity on a Monetary Scale

The Kethuboth book of the Babylonian Talmud (See Exhibit 119 for title page) is supposed to set down rules relating to married life.

The Kethubah is a contract promising to pay a wife a certain sum of money if the husband divorces her, which he can do at will, according to Talmudic doctrine. Perhaps urged on by the growing Christian propaganda against divorce, the Hillelite Jewish school stressed the husband’s freedom to divorce his wife even for some culinary deficiency, or, as Rabbi Aquiba taught, because he had found a better looking woman.

The Kethubah need not be paid if the wife can be proven not to have been a virgin when married. Hence the Jewish custom of the groomsmen waiting outside the bridal chamber door for the bloody sheet to be witnessed, proving the wife’s virginity. Elaborate cuts of these Kethuboth appear in the 1943 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia.

Chicago physician and hospital owner, Dr. A.A. Whamond, used to relate to a member of my family about the money he made by putting in false cat-gut hymens for Jewish girls who were not virgins before they were to be married.

The Talmud price for getting rid of a wife who had been a virgin, is “200 zuz,” given by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia as being 200 denarii or about $30.00.

“If the wife refuses sexual intercourse, she can be threatened with a reduction of her claims in the Kethubah, and this threat can be carried out.” (Same Encyclopedia) If the husband can contend that the wife had not been a virgin, she gets only “a maneh,” or the smallest coin, says the Talmud.
All of this talk about blood and virginity is a favorite Talmudic subject, and seemingly endless. Note, for example, Exhibit 121, Exhibit 122, Exhibit 123, Exhibit 124, Exhibit 125, Exhibit 126, Exhibit 127, Exhibit 128, Exhibit 129, Exhibit 130, Exhibit 131, Exhibit 132, Exhibit 133, Exhibit 134, Exhibit 135, Exhibit 136, Exhibit 137, Exhibit 138, Exhibit 139, Exhibit 140, Exhibit 141, Exhibit 142, Exhibit 143, Exhibit 144, and Exhibit 145 herein, all from the book of Kethuboth.

And, as always in the Talmud, in the book of Kethuboth, asininity is combined with filth. For example, the controlling “Mishnah” or overall rule in Folio 61b (See Exhibit 145) doles out by trades the proper number of relations between husband and wife as: “men of independence, every day; for laborers, twice a week; for ass-drivers, once a week; for camel-drivers, once in thirty days; for sailors, once in six months.”

Sodomy Approved

Despite the thunderings and prohibitions of the Bible, sodomy in general, and specifically with little children, dead bodies, neighbors’ wives and one’s own wife is permitted by the Talmud.

The argument for this last is in Nedarim 20b of the Talmud (page 58 of Soncino translation): “Our Sages said … a man may do whatever he pleases with his wife at intercourse: Meat which comes from the abbatoir [stockyards] may be eaten salted, roasted, cooked or seethed; so with fish from the fishmonger … A woman came before Rab and complained [of her husband’s sodomy with her], “Rabi replied: ‘Wherein does it differ from fish?”

All of this is made Jewish religious doctrine with full Luciferian knowledge of the Bible’s laws against it.

“Thou shalt not lie with mankind” and the Biblical verse, Leviticus 18:22, is actually cited in the same Talmud section where sodomy with boys under nine or baby girls under three is permitted. (See Exhibit 54) The full text of this verse states: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination.”

Small wonder that Christ denounced the Pharisees as nullifying the word of God and violating every concept of human decency.

The Talmud Today

After reciting the denunciations and condemnation of the Talmud down throught the centuries, Rodkinson, in his in troduction to the Talmud, states:

“Such was the past of the Talmud which we hope will never be repeated. Now a glance at the end of the last century and the beginning of this one.

“The colleges for the study of the Talmud are increasing almost in every place where Israel dwells, especially in this country where millions are gathered for the funds of the two great colleges, the Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York, in which the chief study is the Talmud and its post-Talmudical literature.”

This was written early in the present century. Is what Rodkinson wrote true today?

The answer is “yes.” Not only are Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America more active than ever, but a network of schools to teach the Talmud to young Jews now exists from coast to coast.

[page 30] For example, in the Chicago area, the Associated Talmud Torahs of Chicago oversees some 57 schools where the Talmud is taught to young Jews, commencing with their tender years.

If you are told by anyone that the Jewish Talmud is merely ancient history concerning Judaism, don’t be fooled. The Talmud is present-day Judaism and without it so-called Judaism would not exist.

Source: http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/p_chapt05.html

Appendix D

Does Talmud Teach Pedophilia, Incest, Bestiality?

December 4, 2009

freedman.jpgExcerpts from a long letter by Benjamin Freedman (left) to David Goldstein, dated October 10, 1954.

Freedman (1890-1984) had been part of the American Zionist inner circle but, like Goldstein, converted to Christianity. The complete letter appeared in a pamphlet entitled “Facts are Facts.”

In spite of the centrality of the Talmud to Judaism, I doubt if more than 10% of Jews have read any part of it. These articles are as informative to most Jews as to non-Jews. This article is significant because the Illuminati engage in incest, pedophilia, and bestiality. Is the Talmud their guide? Is this why this behavior is being mainstreamed?

Verbatim quotations from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud are required to illustrate the enormity of the Talmud’s iniquity. My comments with verbatim quotations will prove inadequate to do that. In spite of the low language, I will of necessity therefore include in this letter to you I have no compunctions in the matter because the United States Post Office authorities do not bar the Soncino Edition of the Talmud from the mails. Nevertheless I apologize in advance for the language which will of necessity appear in this letter to you. You now understand.

The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.

The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

“THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…

The following are but a few of the many similar quotations with footnotes from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud, the “sort of book” from which Jesus allegedly “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious” subjects:

SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”

This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”

(footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”

SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
(footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
(footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”

ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?”

Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/does_talmud_condone_pedophilia.html

——————————————————————————————————————————

Learn more about paedophile child snuff rings https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/05/07/jewish-paedophiles-and-snuff-movies-the-london-tape-beat-meier-dmitri-vladimirovich-kuznetsov/

View pictures of paedophiles and the royal family https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/jimmy-savile-ted-heath-and-queen-elizabeth-ii-pictures/

Learn more about the British police https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/01/21/how-much-do-you-think-you-can-trust-the-british-police/

Learn more about people trying to murder you and your family https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/02/05/proof-someone-is-trying-to-damage-the-human-body-brain-and-cause-cancer-to-kill-people-slowly/

Learn more about Freemason paedophile rings https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/international-freemason-paedophile-rings-america-britain-france-holland-jersey/

Learn more about the paedophile ring thats been operating inside the British and American intelligence agencies https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/05/22/opilluminatuspiedpiper-northamptonshire-police-helping-cover-up-unitarian-paedosadist-with-satanic-royal-connections-mp-cyril-smith-scandal-because-of-his-royal-connections-force-said-secur/

Learn about the Nazi origins of the European Union https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/opzion-margaret-thatchers-former-economics-advisor-christopher-story-hitlers-european-union-a-common-european-currency-a-pan-european-bank-called-europa-bank-and-thus/

Learn about Nazi UFOs https://jewishpaedophilia.wordpress.com/2015/07/14/optelltale-nazi-flying-disk-prototypes-andreas-epp-testimony-eugen-lardy-testimony-adolf-hitler-hermann-gorings-gerti-vogt-maria-orsitsch-lothar-waiz-karl-haushofer-rudolf-von-sebottendo/

——————————————————————————————————————————

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s